To the Elephants and the
Asses
What did President George
Washington Say
President George Washington and National Debt
As a
very important source of strength and security, cherish public credit. One
method of preserving it is, to use it as sparingly as possible; avoiding
occasions of expense by cultivating peace, but remembering also that timely
disbursements to prepare for danger frequently prevent much greater disbursements
to repel it; avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt, not only by shunning
occasions of expense, but by vigorous exertions in time of peace to discharge
the debts, which unavoidable wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously
throwing upon posterity the burthen, which we ourselves ought to bear. The
execution of these maxims belongs to your representatives, but it is necessary
that public opinion should cooperate. To facilitate to them the performance of
their duty, it is essential that you should practically bear in mind, that
towards the payment of debts there must be Revenue; that to have Revenue there
must be taxes; that no taxes can be devised, which are not more or less
inconvenient and unpleasant; that the intrinsic embarrassment, inseparable from
the selection of the proper objects (which is always a choice of difficulties),
ought to be a decisive motive for a candid construction of the conduct of the
government in making it, and for a spirit of acquiescence in the measures for
obtaining revenue, which the public exigencies may at any time dictate.
This is what President
George Washington had to say about parties (Elephants & Asses) and the
damage that would inevitably follow.
To the
efficacy and permanency of your Union, a Government for the whole is indispensable.
No alliances, however strict, between the parts can be an adequate substitute;
they must inevitably experience the infractions and interruptions, which all
alliances in all times have experienced. Sensible of this momentous truth, you
have improved upon your first essay, by the adoption of a Constitution of
Government better calculated than your former for an intimate Union, and for
the efficacious management of your common concerns. This Government, the
offspring of our own choice, uninfluenced and unawed, adopted upon full
investigation and mature deliberation, completely free in its principles, in
the distribution of its powers, uniting security with energy, and containing
within itself a provision for its own amendment, has a just claim to your confidence
and your support. Respect for its authority, compliance with its laws,
acquiescence in its measures, are duties enjoined by the fundamental maxims of
true Liberty. The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to
make and to alter their Constitutions of Government. But the Constitution which
at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole
people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. The very idea of the power and the
right of the people to establish Government presupposes the duty of every
individual to obey the established Government.
All
obstructions to the execution of the Laws, all combinations and associations,
under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control,
counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted
authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal
tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and
extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation, the will of a party, often a small
but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the
alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the
mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than
the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels, and
modified by mutual interests.
However combinations or associations of the above description may now and
then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to
become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will
be enabled to subvert the power of the people, and to usurp for themselves the
reins of government; destroying afterwards the very engines, which have
lifted them to unjust dominion.
I have already intimated to you the danger of
parties in the state, with particular reference to the founding of them on
geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn
you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of
party, generally.
This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable
from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind.
It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled,
controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its
greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.
The alternate domination of one faction over
another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which
in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is
itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and
permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries, which result, gradually
incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of
an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more
able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the
purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty.
Without looking forward to an extremity of
this kind, (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight,) the
common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it
the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.
It serves always to distract the Public
Councils, and enfeeble the Public Administration. It agitates the Community
with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one part
against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door
to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the
government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and
the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.
There is an opinion, that parties in free
countries are useful checks upon the administration of the Government, and
serve to keep alive the spirit of Liberty. This within certain limits is
probably true; and in Governments of a Monarchical cast, Patriotism may look
with indulgence, if not with favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those of
the popular character, in Governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be
encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be
enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And, there being constant
danger of excess, the effort ought to be, by force of public opinion, to
mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform
vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it
should consume.
It is important, likewise, that the habits of
thinking in a free country should inspire caution, in those entrusted with its
administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional
spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach
upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all
the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a
real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse
it, which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the
truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of
political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositories,
and constituting each the Guardian of the Public Weal against invasions by the
others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our
country and under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to
institute them. If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or
modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be
corrected by an amendment in the way, which the constitution designates. But
let there be no change by usurpation; for, though this, in one instance, may be
the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments
are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil
any partial or transient benefit, which the use can at any time yield.
President Washington on Religion and Morality
Of all
the dispositions and habits, which lead to political prosperity, Religion and
Morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute
of Patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human
happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men and Citizens. The mere
Politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A
volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity.
Let it simply be asked, Where is the security for property, for reputation, for
life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the
instruments of investigation in Courts of Justice? And let us with caution
indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion.
Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of
peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect, that
national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.
It is
substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular
government. The rule, indeed, extends with more or less force to every species
of free government. Who, that is a sincere friend to it, can look with
indifference upon attempts to shake the foundation of the fabric ?
Promote, then, as an object of primary
importance, institutions for the general diffusion of knowledge. In proportion
as the structure of a government gives force to public opinion, it is essential
that public opinion should be enlightened.
President George Washington on sticking our noses
in other
people’s business
Observe good faith and justice towards all
Nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and Morality enjoin this
conduct; and can it be, that good policy does not equally enjoin it? It will be
worthy of a free, enlightened, and, at no distant period, a great Nation, to
give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided
by an exalted justice and benevolence. Who can doubt, that, in the course of
time and things, the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary
advantages, which might be lost by a steady adherence to it ? Can it be, that
Providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a Nation with its
Virtue? The experiment, at least, is recommended by every sentiment which
ennobles human nature. Alas! is it rendered impossible by its vices ?
In the
execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential, than that permanent,
inveterate antipathies against particular Nations, and passionate attachments
for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable
feelings towards all should be cultivated. The Nation, which indulges towards
another an habitual hatred, or an habitual fondness, is in some degree a slave.
It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is
sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one
nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury,
to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable,
when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence frequent
collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests. The Nation, prompted by
ill-will and resentment, sometimes impels to war the Government, contrary to
the best calculations of policy. The Government sometimes participates in the
national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject; at
other times, it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of
hostility instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious
motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of Nations has been
the victim.
So
likewise, a passionate attachment of one Nation for another produces a variety
of evils. Sympathy for the favorite Nation, facilitating the illusion of an
imaginary common interest, in cases where no real common interest exists, and
infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a
participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter, without adequate
inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite
Nation of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the Nation
making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been
retained; and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate,
in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to
ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens, (who devote themselves to the
favorite nation,) facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own
country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the
appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for
public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish
compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.
As
avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are
particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent Patriot. How
many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice
the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the
Public Councils! Such an attachment of a small or weak, towards a great and
powerful nation, dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.
Against
the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me,
fellow-citizens,) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake;
since history and experience prove, that foreign influence is one of the most
baneful foes of Republican Government. But that jealousy, to be useful, must be
impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided,
instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation,
and excessive dislike of another, cause those whom they actuate to see danger
only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on
the other. Real patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are
liable to become suspected and odious; while its tools and dupes usurp the
applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.
The
great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is, in extending
our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as
possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled
with perfect good faith. Here let us stop.
Europe
has a set of primary interests, which to us have none, or a very remote
relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of
which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be
unwise in us to implicate ourselves, by artificial ties, in the ordinary
vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of
her friendships or enmities.
Our
detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different
course. If we remain one people, under an efficient government, the period is
not far off, when we may defy material injury from external annoyance; when we
may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality, we may at any time
resolve upon, to be scrupulously respected; when belligerent nations, under the
impossibility of making acquisitions upon us, will not lightly hazard the
giving us provocation; when we may choose peace or war, as our interest, guided
by justice, shall counsel.
Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a
situation? Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving
our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity
in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice?
It is our true policy to steer clear of
permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as
we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood as capable of
patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less
applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best
policy. I repeat it, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their
genuine sense. But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to
extend them.
Taking
care always to keep ourselves, by suitable establishments, on a respectable
defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary
emergencies.
Harmony,
liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and
interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial
hand; neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences; consulting
the natural course of things; diffusing and diversifying by gentle means the
streams of commerce, but forcing nothing; establishing, with powers so
disposed, in order to give trade a stable course, to define the rights of our
merchants, and to enable the government to support them, conventional rules of
intercourse, the best that present circumstances and mutual opinion will
permit, but temporary, and liable to be from time to time abandoned or varied,
as experience and circumstances shall dictate; constantly keeping in view, that
it is folly in one nation to look for disinterested favors from another; that
it must pay with a portion of its independence for whatever it may accept under
that character; that, by such acceptance, it may place itself in the condition
of having given equivalents for nominal favors, and yet of being reproached
with ingratitude for not giving more. There can be no greater error than to
expect or calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion,
which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard.