U.S. gunboats, sinking of ships
By BRUCE FINLEY, THE DENVER POST; December 20, 2004
MANTA, Ecuador -- American counterterrorism officials have set
up a high-seas gantlet deploying Coast Guard cutters off Latin American
coasts and arresting foreign nationals trying to leave their own
Off the coast of Ecuador alone, Coast Guard crews have blocked
at least 37 boats and detained more than 4,575 suspected illegal
migrants during the past four years, records show. During the past two
years, they have sunk a dozen emptied migrant boats that they deemed
"unseaworthy" -- setting them ablaze and firing their .50-caliber
machine guns into them.
The interdiction effort fits into a new worldwide strategy that
Department of Homeland Security officials describe as "pushing our
borders out." Enforcing U.S. laws abroad is crucial, they contend, to
control illegal immigration, estimated at 500,000 people a year, and
close security gaps terrorists could exploit.
"The president has authority to secure the borders of the United
States," said Lt. Cmdr. Brad Kieserman, operations legal chief at Coast
Guard headquarters in Washington.
That means not only off Ecuador but "anywhere in the world,"
Kieserman said. Coast Guard and Navy ships will "go to the source of
transnational crime and interdict it before it gets to the United
States," he said.
U.S. foreign-policy experts warn that effective world policing
means balancing benefits with backlash. A new bitterness pulses through
the streets of this Ecuadorean port city, where centuries-old fishing
culture fuses with the business of smuggling people north.
Coast Guard commanders "at least should have brought my boat
back here and put it in the hands of Ecuadorean authorities," said
Segundo Moreiro-Vegos, 41, owner of the 70-foot Diego Armando, which
was sunk Feb. 22. He said he didn't know when he rented it for fishing
that smugglers would cram on 103 migrants.
The United States sinks boats "to show the power they have to
stop migrants, to show the other fishermen not to (get involved). ...
They board with machine guns, put everyone on the floor, tie hands,"
"Before, I was feeling good about American people being down
here. Now, I don't want to see them. We suffer so much because of these
people," he added.
Some analysts see this as contemporary gunboat diplomacy. If
foreign armed forces stopped U.S. boats in this way, "we'd call it an
act of war," said John Pike, director of the centrist Washington think
tank Global Security. "There is no world government to enforce
international law. It's always been the case that the strong do what
they can, and the weak do what they must."
Others say U.S. officials are pushing too far, straining the
already-thin good will and support that the United States needs to
fight terrorism, the illegal spread of weapons and other threats.
"To have U.S. ships off the coast of Ecuador sinking boats is
not the best public relations for the United States," said Robert
Leiken, director of immigration and security studies at the bipartisan
Nixon Center think tank in Washington.
If stopping illegal immigration is the goal, cracking down on
U.S. employers who hire illegal workers would be far more effective,
"Basically, we have one continent which is so far not penetrated
by Islam; there's very little Muslim radicalism in Latin America," he
said. "I'd think we'd want these people on our side.
"We're going to need people from Ecuador, El Salvador and other
countries. To have anti-Americanism whipped up for what seem to be
extraneous, unnecessary reasons ... I'm not so sure this is the way to
"As long as we aren't willing to close our own internal border
by pursuing interior enforcement, how can we go out into other
U.S. courts have affirmed a right to enforce U.S. laws abroad if
crimes affect the United States.
Neither the United States nor Ecuador has signed the U.N. Convention on
the Law of the Sea that would provide a forum for hashing out disputes.
Pacific Currents is a weekly look at issues and personalities
around the Pacific Rim.