The pregnancy trap
“Nobody Gets Married Any More, Mister”
Welcome
to our urban high schools, where kids have kids and learning dies.
By
Gerry
Garibaldi
The
Week
February
18, 2011
In my short time as a teacher in Connecticut,
I have muddled through President Bush’s No Child Left Behind act, which tied
federal funding of schools to various reforms, and through President Obama’s
Race to the Top initiative, which does much the same thing, though with
different benchmarks. Thanks to the feds, urban schools like mine—already
entitled to substantial federal largesse under Title I, which provides funds to
public schools with large low-income populations—are swimming in money. At my
school, we pay five teachers to tutor kids after school and on Saturdays. They
sit in classrooms waiting for kids who never show up. We don’t want for
books—or for any of the cutting-edge gizmos that non–Title I schools can’t
afford: computerized whiteboards, Elmo projectors, the works. Our facility is
state-of-the-art, thanks to a recent $40 million face-lift, with gleaming new
hallways and bathrooms and a fully computerized library.
Here’s my prediction: the money, the reforms,
the gleaming porcelain, the hopeful rhetoric about saving our children—all of
it will have a limited impact, at best, on most city schoolchildren. Urban
teachers face an intractable problem, one that we cannot spend or even teach
our way out of: teen pregnancy. This year, all of my favorite girls are
pregnant, four in all, future unwed mothers every one. There will be no
innovation in this quarter, no race to the top. Personal moral accountability
is the electrified rail that no politician wants to touch.
My first encounter with teen pregnancy was a
girl named Nicole, a pretty 15-year-old who had rings on every finger and great
looped earrings and a red pen with fluffy pink feathers and a heart that lit up
when she wrote with it. Hearts seemed to be on everything—in her signature, on
her binder; there was often a little plastic heart barrette in her hair, which
she had dyed in bright hues recalling a Siamese fighting fish. She was enrolled
in two of my classes: English and journalism.
My main gripe with Nicole was that she fell
asleep in class. Each morning—bang!—her head hit the desk. Waking her was like
waking a badger. Nicole’s unmarried mother, it turned out, worked nights, so
Nicole would slip out with friends every evening, sometimes staying out until 3
am, and then show up in class
exhausted, surly, and hungry.
After a dozen calls home, her mother finally
got back to me. Your daughter is staying out late, I reported. The voice at the
other end of the phone sounded abashed and bone-weary. “I know, I know, I’m
sorry,” she repeated over and over. “I’ll talk to her. I’m sorry.”
For a short time, things got better. Nicole’s
grades started to improve. Encouraged, I hectored and cajoled and praised her
every small effort. She was an innately bright girl who might, if I dragged her
by the heels, eventually survive the rigors of a community college.
Then one morning, her head dropped again. I
rapped my knuckles on her desk. “Leave me alone, mister,” she said. “I feel
sick.”
There was a sly exchange of looks among the
other girls in class, a giggle or two, and then one of them said: “She’s
pregnant, Mr. Garibaldi.”
She lifted her face and smiled at her
friends, then dropped her head back down. I picked up my grimy metal garbage
can and set it beside her desk, just in case. A moment later she vomited, and I
dispatched her to the nurse. In the years since, I’ve escorted girls whose
water has just broken, their legs trembling and wobbly, to the principal’s
office, where their condition barely raises an eyebrow.
Within my lifetime, single parenthood has been transformed from
shame to saintliness. In our society, perversely, we celebrate the unwed mother
as a heroic figure, like a fireman or a police officer. During the last presidential
election, much was made of Obama’s mother, who was a single parent. Movie stars
and pop singers flaunt their daddy-less babies like fishing trophies.
None of this is lost on my students. In
today’s urban high school, there is no shame or social ostracism when girls
become pregnant. Other girls in school want to pat their stomachs. Their
friends throw baby showers at which meager little gifts are given. After
delivery, the girls return to school with baby pictures on their cell phones or
slipped into their binders, which they eagerly share with me. Often they sit
together in my classes, sharing insights into parenting, discussing the taste
of Pedialite or the exhaustion that goes with the job. On my way home at night,
I often see my students in the projects that surround our school, pushing their
strollers or hanging out on their stoops instead of doing their homework.
Connecticut is among the most generous of the
states to out-of-wedlock mothers. Teenage girls like Nicole qualify for a vast
array of welfare benefits from the state and federal governments: medical
coverage when they become pregnant (called “Healthy Start”); later, medical
insurance for the family (“Husky”); child care (“Care 4 Kids”); Section 8
housing subsidies; the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; cash
assistance. If you need to get to an appointment, state-sponsored dial-a-ride
is available. If that appointment is college-related, no sweat: education
grants for single mothers are available, too. Nicole didn’t have to worry about
finishing the school year; the state sent a $35-an-hour tutor directly to her
home halfway into her final trimester and for six weeks after the baby arrived.
In theory, this provision of services is
humane and defensible, an essential safety net for the most vulnerable—children
who have children. What it amounts to in practice is a monolithic public
endorsement of single motherhood—one that has turned our urban high schools
into puppy mills. The safety net has become a hammock.
The young father almost always greets the pregnancy with adolescent
excitement, as if a baby were a new Xbox game. In Nicole’s case, the father’s
name was David. David manfully walked Nicole to class each morning and gave her
a kiss at the door. I had him in homeroom and asked if he planned to marry her.
“No” was his frank answer. But he did have plans to help out. David himself
lived with his mother. His dad had served a short sentence in prison for drug
possession and ran a motorcycle-repair shop somewhere upstate. One afternoon,
David proudly opened his father’s website to show me the customized motorcycles
he built. There he was, the spit and image of his son, smiling atop a gleaming
vintage Harley, not a care in the world.
Boys without fathers, like David, cultivate
an overweening bravado to overcome a deeper sense of vulnerability and male
confusion. They strut, swear, and swagger. There’s a he-man thing to getting a
girl pregnant that marks you as an adult in the eyes of your equally unmoored
peers. But a boy’s interest in his child quickly vanishes. When I ask girls if
the father is helping out with the baby, they shrug. “I don’t care if he does
or not,” I’ve heard too often.
As for girls without fathers, they are often
among my most disruptive students. You walk on eggshells with them. You broker
remarks, you negotiate insults, all the while trying to pull them along on a
slender thread. Their anger toward male authority can be lacerating. They view
trips to the principal’s office like victory laps.
With Nicole, I dug in. In journalism class, I brought up
the subject of teen pregnancy and suggested that she and a friend of hers,
Maria, write a piece together about their experiences. They hesitated; I
pressed the matter. “Do you think getting pregnant when you’re a teenager is a
good thing or a bad thing?”
“Depends,” Nicole replied caustically,
glancing at Maria and another friend, Shanice, for support. They knew this was
coming and went on the defensive.
“On what?”
“My mom and my grandma both got pregnant when
they were teens, and they’re good mothers.”
“Nobody gets married any more, mister,”
Shanice and Maria chime in. “You’re just picking on us because we have kids.”
At this point, my “picking” has only just
begun. It’s partly for their benefit, but mostly for the other girls in the
room, who haven’t said a word. As much as Nicole is aware of her mother’s
sacrifices, she is equally proud of her mother’s choice to keep her. It’s
locked away in her heart like a cameo. They’re best friends, she offers. The
talk turns to her mother’s loyalty and love, and soon the class rises in a
choir to mom’s defense.
“Fine,” I say, glowering like Heath Ledger’s
Joker. “If that’s your position, like any good journalist, you have to back up
your arguments with facts and statistics.”
As do most of my 11th-graders, Nicole reads
at a fifth-grade level, which means I must peruse the articles and statistics
along with her, side by side. She groans each time I pick out a long article
and counts the number of pages before she reads. With my persistent nudging,
she and Maria begin to pull out the statistics for the children of single
parents. From the FBI: 63 percent of all suicides are individuals from
single-parent households. From the Centers for Disease Control: 75 percent of
adolescents in chemical-dependency hospitals come from single-parent
households. From the Children’s Defense Fund: more than half of all youths
incarcerated for criminal acts come from single-parent households. And so on.
“I don’t want to write about this!” Nicole
complains. “I’ve changed my mind.”
“Why?”
“Nobody wants to read it.”
I point out that they committed to it. If
they don’t complete the essay by the due date, they know I will give them an F.
Their first drafts are little more than two
scribbled paragraphs, which they toss to me as a completed assignment and I
toss back. Maria, in particular, rebels. She wants to recast the article in a
rosier vein and talk about how happy her son makes her. It’s in these light
skirmishes that we have our richest discussions. When the girls open up, their
vague doubts come to the surface, and my flinty-eyed circuit preacher melts
away. A father myself, I understand a parent’s love. Our talk turns more
sweetly to teething cures, diaper rashes, and solid food. Nicole listens to us
with tender interest. It’s in these moments that I feel most effective as a
teacher. I suggest ways of incorporating that love into the piece, while also
hoping that some of these grim statistics have gotten through to them.
As morbid as it sounds, the students take an interest in obituary
writing. I have them write their own obits, fictional biographies that foretell
the arc of their lives. From Nicole’s, I learn that her mother was 16 when she
had Nicole; her father, 14. After high school, the fictional Nicole went on to
have four more kids—with strangely concocted names, all beginning with M—whom
she loved dearly and who loved her dearly. She also left six grandchildren. She
died of old age in her bed.
“Nicole, you never got married?” I remarked.
“No,” she responded with a note of obstinacy
in her voice.
“I think you would make a wonderful wife for
someone.”
“I would make a good wife,” she
replied. “I know a lot of stuff. But I’m not going to get married.” She was
speaking to a hard fate that she was accepting as her future. She was slipping
away.
As Nicole entered her third trimester, she had a minor
complication with her pregnancy and disappeared for nearly two weeks. She
returned, pale and far behind in my classes. She no longer had to report to two
classes: physical education and a science lab where strong chemicals were used.
The administration didn’t want her to be alone during those periods, and since
my schedule coincided with the vacant spots, I was asked to be her chaperone.
For five weeks, Nicole became my shadow. If I
had cafeteria duty, she’d happily trot along. I’d buy her a candy bar and she’d
plop down in the seat beside me. I’d also escort her to her restroom runs,
which were frequent, and wait for her outside the door. She carried a grainy
sonogram picture of the baby, framed in a pink card with a stork on the front.
Gazing at it with a smile, I felt my duplicity and the ragged trap of my
convictions.
Her paleness and fatigue alarmed me. I
carried Vitamin C drops in my pocket and slipped her a constant supply. A
second private concern began to nag at me: the father in me wanted to be
protective and kind, but Nicole was becoming too connected with me. She blew
off assignments regularly now. When I admonished her, she only giggled and
promised to get them done. She trusted me and would never think that falling
behind in my classes would result in a failing grade. Life had allowed her to
slide before, through every year of her education, as others in her life had
slid—starting with her father, whom she barely recalled.
I felt that I was being drawn into this
undertow. A simple D would ease everyone’s load, particularly mine, and Nicole
wouldn’t register yet another betrayal of trust. More than anything, she wanted
a buoy in her choppy sea.
Nicole failed both my classes, which meant
summer school. When she returned the following year, she was in good spirits.
The birth of her son had gone well. She had a heart-adorned album full of
photos of her boy. Things were settled, she said. She was going to work hard
this year; she felt motivated, even eager. And by year’s end, her reading level
had indeed risen nearly two grades—but it was still far below what she would
need to score as proficient on the Connecticut Academic Performance Test, one
of the yardsticks for accountability in Title I schools.
The path for young, unwed mothers—and for
their children—can be brutal. Consider how often girls get molested in their
own homes after Mom has decided to let her boyfriend move in. The boyfriend
splits the rent and the food bill, but he often sees his girlfriend’s teenage
daughter as fair game. Teachers whisper their suspicions in the lunchroom or in
the hallways when they notice that one of their students has become suddenly
emotional, that her grades have inexplicably dropped, or that she stays late
after school to hang out in her teacher’s classroom or begins sleeping over at
a friend’s house several nights a week. Sometimes she simply disappears.
And there are other dangers. I once had a
student named Jasmine, who had given birth over the summer. She did just enough
to earn Ds in my class. One day, I observed her staring off mulishly into space
for nearly the entire period, not hearing a word I said and ignoring her
assignment. At the end of class, I took her aside and asked, with some
irritation, what the matter was.
Her eyes welled with tears. “I gave my son to
his father to look after yesterday. When I picked him up, he had bruises on his
head and a cut.” Her son was six months old.
Honestly? I just wanted that day to go by.
But we have a duty to our students, both moral and legal. “You have to be a
brave mama and report him,” I said. I led her to the office and to the school
social worker, and I tipped off the campus trooper. Even with that support, she
backed off from filing a complaint and shortly afterward dropped out of school
to be with her baby.
My students often become curious about my
personal life. The question most frequently asked is, “Do you have kids?”
“Two,” I say.
The next question is always heartbreaking.
“Do they live with you?”
Every fall, new education theories arrive,
born like orchids in the hothouses of big-time university education
departments. Urban teachers are always first in line for each new bloom. We’ve
been retrofitted as teachers a dozen times over. This year’s innovation is the
Data Wall, a strategy in which teachers must test endlessly in order to produce
data about students’ progress. The Obama administration has spent lavishly to
ensure that professional consultants monitor its implementation.
Every year, the national statistics summon a
fresh chorus of outrage at the failure of urban public schools. Next year, I
fear, will be little different.
Gerry
Garibaldi was an executive and screenwriter in Hollywood before becoming an
English teacher at an urban high school in Connecticut.